published:
|
12/07/2000
|
posted to site:
|
12/07/2000
|
MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE ENHANCEMENT (MASE) II
MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE ENHANCEMENT (MASE) II
Local Systemic Grant (#ESI - 9552863)
PI Annual Progress Report, Year Five
September 1, 1999 - August 31, 2000
- ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS
1. ANNUAL OVERVIEW AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The professional development offerings listed above continued to be offered in year five with the following changes and additions. Science as a Core for Literacy was renamed as Science as a Context for Literacy to more accurately indicate that scientific inquiry includes writing, reading, listening, and speaking as students record and share their findings. Inquiry into Technololgical Design was offered both as an 18-hour session and a 36-hour session; a three-hour overview was also designed and implemented. Three modules of Lenses On Learning, a professional development curriculum for administrators developed by the Education Development Center related to understanding and supporting standards-based mathematics, were successfully field tested as a MASE II professional development offering during year five.
New offerings include:
Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Technology 15-30 hours
Inquiry into Matter, 12 hours; Inquiry into Liquids, 12 hours
Study groups, 15-30 hours
Year five Accomplishments
Major accomplishments for year five include continuation of those listed in the year four report, as well as:
WGBH in Boston selected the MASE project as one site for filming of a video series on models of successful professional development. The focus was on design of professional development using multiple strategies as described in the book by Susan Loucks-Horsley et. al. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics.
The syllabi for MASE II FOSS Structured Use Workshops, grades 3-5, were revised by
TOSAs and Teacher Leaders to reflect the 2000 revision of the FOSS modules.
2. PROJECT FINDINGS
What Are The Lessons Learned That Have Resulted
From The Project During Year Five?
The lessons learned during year four continued to be true during year five. Additional lessons learned during year five include:
District/State Context
Movement of teachers and administrators contributed to what MASE terms as "flow-through." Flow-through slows movement toward expert standards-based teaching and learning by all teachers in project schools that experience a high rate of staff instability, while increasing standards-based teaching and learning throughout the district in MASE and non-MASE schools.
Professional Development
As state accountability becomes the norm within the state, it is increasingly important to make connections between standards-based teaching and curriculum resources (FOSS and Investigations in Number, Data and Space) with the Nevada Content Standards/District Curriculum Framework and the CTB Terra Nova norm-referenced test. It is necessary to help teachers gain confidence that their students will achieve on state and district tests when they teach using FOSS and Investigations in Number, Data, and Space.
As the project relies more and more on Teacher Leaders, the challenge of maintaining the "MASE culture" (e.g., the spirit of inquiry, respect for the learner, and depth of content) increases. Teacher Leaders lack time and sometimes interest in philosophical dialogue and readings that TOSAs have the responsibility and opportunity to reflect and dialogue with colleagues.
Leadership Development
Use of the Horizon Professional Development Protocol in Leadership Development effectively focused Teacher Leaders on elements that can be used to enhance professional development sessions they facilitate.
Administrator and School Team Leadership
Nationally developed, high quality professional development curriculum for administrators reduces time needed to design syllabi, increases consistency of implementation, and adds a national perspective to the course content and the role of the administrator in reform.
What Are The Unanticipated Effects That Have Resulted From The Project, Significant Changes In District Policy, Support Of Key
Stakeholders Or Other Facets Of The System That Will Likely Affect Sustainability Of The Lsc Reform?
It is the MASE staff assumption that when students learn in standards-based settings using Investigations in Number, Data, and Space, students will development the capacity to demonstrate learning and achievement on all types of assessments including norm-referenced tests, open ended, and performance assessments. Although MASE II staff remains cautious regarding the results of Terra Nova testing data, we are tracking results of MASE II schools. Findings are beginning to suggest that MASE II schools, including schools with under-served populations, who have supportive administrative leadership, are performing well, as indicated on the following charts. The following results are from schools with strong and knowledgeable principals and teachers who implement Investigations in Number, Data, and Space as written in most cases.
One principal, Ms. Roselinsky reports,
"We are seeing the results of four years of hard work. Were moving the students out of the lower quartile and up into the top quartile. It shows that for the students that have been here for consecutive years of a continuous math program (Investigations supported by Developing Number Concepts), it works! Some 4th graders are doing extremely well, but new students are doing well, also. If you stay with a program it pays off. The most exciting thing I saw during TerraNova testing last year was students actually using strategies to attack unfamiliar problems. They are more confident, and it shows. We also use routine homework for skills practice because it connects with parents.
TerraNova 4th Grade Test Results
Bracken Elementary School
Year/comments |
Below 25th Percentile |
Above 75th Percentile |
1997 (implemented Investigations after testing)
|
45% |
14% |
1998 |
23% |
21% |
1999 |
19% |
25% |
Bracken ES TerraNova 4th Grade Math Comprehensive and Computation Scores
1999 -- 78% low income; 14% White, 28% Black, 56% Hispanic
Year/ ability score |
Math Comprehensive |
Math Computation |
1996 27 |
25 |
27 |
1997 31 |
30 |
34 |
1998 33 |
48 |
42 |
1999 40 |
53 |
63 |
Antonellos math test scores, both comprehensive and computation continue to increase even though the ability score holds steady. The 1999/2000 computation scores were the highest in the district, so high that the students were required to be retested. Upon retesting under very stringent conditions, the students scored even better than they did the first time. The principal, Andrea Phillips, says,
"I believe it goes to show that everything the K-3 teachers have been doing with Investigations and Kathy Richardson material has been paying off. Because our school is in a relatively stable neighborhood and we have a low staff turnover, nearly all of the students have benefited from 3 full years of MASE training. We are just now seeing the return on that investment."
Antonello ES TerraNova 4th Grade Math Comprehensive and Computation Scores
1999 -- 13% low income; 65% White, 14% Black, 14% Hispanic
Year/ ability score |
Math Comprehensive |
Math Computation |
1996 60 |
59 |
58 |
1997 62 |
65 |
65 |
1998 62 |
70 |
70 |
1999 62 |
79 |
86 |
One mother told a MASE TOSA that their family purposefully chose to move into the Antonello attendance zone based on the schools published test results, particularly the mathematics scores. Another parent who serves on the PTA board commented that although the parents she talks to feel that the principals standards are very tough, they are worth it. Also, she indicated that even though teachers are gone a lot from their childrens classrooms for professional training, because the principal has so clearly communicated the purpose and the benefit of that training, the parents support it wholeheartedly. They feel that the payoff has been in their students educational achievement. In her words, "I feel like a B at Antonello is as good as an A anywhere else."
Assessment
The MARS assessment component continued to be an important component of MASE II during year five. Teachers and administrators reported increased focus on the mathematics content when planning lessons as well as attention to student thinking as a result of MARS professional development. Teachers learned how to implement and score the MARS assessments. The Nevada funded Regional Professional Development Program staff is implementing the Backwards Assessment Model (BAM), and MARS tasks are utilized to assess student concept development in MASE II schools as part of the BAM model. One MARS Teacher Leader was hired as a member of the Regional Professional Development Program staff.
Two TOSAs attended the Vermont Assessment Inquiry and Teaching Intertwined Conference, January, 2000, with the principal and two Teacher Leaders from the same project school. The teachers implemented the Vermont Assessment and plan to expand use in the school based on implementation results. Components of the Vermont Assessment such as "photo journalism" were integrated into existing MASE professional development offerings and as a way of sharing lessons learned during a Teachers Leadership Development session in May, 2000.
Three teachers and the MASE PI attended the FOSS Assessment scoring sessions in Fresno California, July, 2000 to determine if the content and process could be used to assess student learning in science. MASE staff and Teacher Leaders are recommending implementation during year six. The new CCSD superintendent is from Fresno and values the FOSS assessment system.
District/State Context
The context of the school district changed dramatically in July 2000 when the district superintendent and the assistant superintendent for elementary education retired. The new superintendent immediately announced that the district focus for elementary was literacy, "all students will read by third grade" and algebra for all eighth grade students. Although both the new superintendent and assistant superintendent for elementary education indicated support for MASE II project goals, teachers and administrators are now focused on literacy as the high priority for K-5. The superintendent is also planning to reorganize the district from an elementary and secondary configuration to a K-12 plan, which also creates a distraction for many and generates a "wait and see" attitude for some administrators and teachers.
Due to the state accountability program and the literacy priority, teachers and administrators are feeling pressure to concentrate on literacy, making it harder to focus on science and mathematics. As a result, the project is working to achieve a balanced vision of science and mathematics. MASE II science professional development is grounded in rich science content and experiences that highlight when and how writing, reading, listening, and speaking are natural components of scientific inquiry. It is necessary to maintain the focus on science while building a case that good science has the potential to improve student literacy.
The "Components of An Effective Science Lesson" and the "Components of An Effective Mathematics Lesson" continue to be documents that promote project work in administrator sessions district-wide.
To address the need identified in the Year Four Project Evaluation by Inverness Research Associates to build a case for reform, a CCSD Board of School Trustees member, two elementary area superintendents, one principal and the K-5 Science and Mathematics Administrative Specialist attended the four-day Exploratorium Leadership Seminar in the spring of 2000. The board member publicly praised her experience at a meeting of the board curriculum committee when she returned. One Area Superintendent reshaped her area emphasis and professional development focus based on her experience at the Exploratorium. The MASE newsletter has been expanded to four pages to better broadcast project success and lessons learned.
Three Regional Professional Development Programs (RPDP) were funded two years ago by the Nevada legislature and the RPDP serving four southern Nevada counties is based in our district. Four MASE Teacher Leaders were hired as RPDP staff members, including one MARS leader. The RPDP staff members function as district and state professional developers distributing knowledge gained as participants of MASE. MASE leaders are continuing to assume leadership roles in the district; they build the case for reform from a broad platform that extends to a different audience than the MASE II audience.
Central and Site-Based Management/Decision-making
MASE project evaluators recommended frank discussions with MASE schools to answer questions such as: "Is it (reform) working? How do I know? Is it worth the extra work?" Therefore, we worked with Inverness research to develop an interview protocol that TOSAs will use in September 2000 to meet with project school administrators and then visit each classroom to gather data and begin the dialogue. MASE staff will assess where to focus work based on movement of principals and teachers, site-based needs identified in interviews, and numbers of teachers with less than 100 hours of MASE professional development.
Due to an increase in teacher salaries (as a result of arbitration), new requirements for special education programs, and lack of additional funds from the legislature, there is a critical funding shortage in the district. The result is that a replenishment center is again moved down the line of priorities. As described by project evaluators, replenishment of materials is a continuing challenge as purchases are dependent upon priorities established through site-based management. In addition, funding levels are not equal among schools due to varying levels of community support. MASE staff must problem solve with schools so that they act on their commitment as MASE schools, ensuring that materials are available for teachers.
Growth and Diffusion
The combination of the state accountability program and teacher and administrator mobility have resulted in an increased number of new staff at existing MASE project schools for the 2000/01 school year. The project will focus on ensuring that 2000 teachers have 100 hours of professional development during the no cost extension period of MASE II.
Nationally Developed Professional Development Curriculum
MASE staff continues to find the value in using professional development curriculum developed by nationally recognized experts. The courses are expertly designed and challenge leaders and participants to move to new levels of expertise. The project continued to expand the number and depth of knowledge of leaders as they interact with nationally recognized experts who develop professional development curriculum and provide leadership development institutes that MASE leaders attend. Two MASE TOSAs attended the one week DMI Field Test Institute. As a result, MASE offerings during year six will include Examining Features of Shape and Measuring Space in 1,2, and 3 Dimensions. Two MASE Teacher Leaders attended the DMI Leadership Institute. One DMI-trained TOSA is mentoring the two Teacher Leaders as they facilitate Building a System of Tens and Making Meaning for Operations during project year six. The Teacher Leaders were participants in the sessions during previous years, the first step in the MASE leadership component. Administrators and MASE staff contribute research on the Lenses on Learning module as they learn from the curriculum.
A leadership team was selected to expand their understanding of the MARS processes and materials by attending the Balanced Assessment Workshop at Michigan State. This team joined professionals from several districts nationwide to further refine their understanding of balanced assessment. The knowledge gained from participating in the workshops enabled this leadership team to successfully develop and facilitate a series of six workshops.
Leader Guides were developed by the leadership team to use with the training sessions for Cohort 2 schools. These guides were based on the materials presented at the Balanced Assessment Workshop attended by the leadership team at Michigan State for tasks that were not included in the materials binder from the workshop. Two members of the leadership team contributed to the ongoing research of the MARS staff at Michigan State through participating in interviews and being observed during the professional development sessions.
In addition, a new MASE scientist partner and a Teacher Leader attended the one week training for the Entomology module offered by TEAM 2000 and First Hand Learning, Inc., Buffalo, New York, July, 2000. They will offer the 18-hour Entomology content workshop to MASE teachers during 2000/01 school year.
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
What Professional Development Opportunities
Are Provided By Your Project?
Three new professional development offerings were added during year five of the project:
Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Technology, Inquiry into Matter, a study group on science notebooks. These courses were added to the chart below as well as title and hour changes for the year six offerings.
MASE Professional Development Course Offerings for Teachers**
MASE professional development course offerings are designed to enhance teacher knowledge in the following four dimensions: 1) science and mathematics content, 2) how children learn, 3) effective pedagogy and assessment, and 4) standards-based materials. As indicated on the chart below, courses frequently emphasize multiple domains. Teachers choose which courses to attend based on their needs, experience level, and site-based priorities.
MASE project science offerings include: |
Course
Duration |
Science/
Math
Content |
How Children Learn |
Pedagogy
and
Assessment |
Standards-based Material |
·
|
Structured Use Workshops - FOSS |
18-24 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Classroom-based Science Sessions |
3-36 hrs. |
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Insightful Use of FOSS |
6-18 hrs. |
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Inquiry into Liquids |
12 hrs. |
P
|
|
P
|
|
·
|
Inquiry into Matter |
12 hrs. |
P
|
|
P
|
|
·
|
Force and Motion |
18-36 hrs. |
P
|
|
P
|
|
·
|
Science as a Context for Writing, Reading, Listening, Speaking |
6-18 hrs. |
|
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Science Notebooks |
3-18 hrs. |
|
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Vocabulary Development in Science |
3-18 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
|
·
|
Science Assessment |
48 hrs. |
P
|
|
P
|
|
|
MASE project mathematics offerings include: |
|
|
|
|
·
|
Structured Use Workshops - INVESTIGATIONS |
30 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Classroom-based Mathematics Sessions |
3-36 hrs. |
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
K-2 Mathematics Mini-conference |
18 hrs. |
|
P
|
P
|
|
·
|
Mathematics Assessment Resource Service (MARS) |
48 hrs. |
P
|
|
P
|
|
·
|
Bridges to the Mathematics Classroom |
30 hrs. |
P
|
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Developing Mathematical Ideas (DMI) |
48 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
·
|
Computation: Mental Math and Number Talks |
3-30 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
|
MASE project science/mathematics offerings include: |
|
|
|
|
·
|
How Children Learn |
6 hrs. |
|
P
|
P
|
|
·
|
Inquiry Institute |
90 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
|
·
|
Inquiry into Technological Design |
18-30 hrs. |
P
|
P
|
P
|
|
·
|
Study Groups |
15-30 hrs. |
P
|
* |
* |
* |
·
|
Integrating Science, Mathematics and Technology |
6-30 hrs. |
* |
|
P
|
|
*Domain emphasis is dependent on the topic studied.
**Technology is integrated in selected course offerings.
What Are The Project Strategies For
Deepening Teacher Content Knowledge?
The courses listed above were also offered during year five to deepen teacher content knowledge. Administrators also focused on how to recognize content rich lessons by referring to the FOSS and Investigations teachers manuals. Three new workshops were offered during year five to increase teacher content knowledge:
OFFERING: Science Notebook Study Group, 15 to 30 hours
The Science Notebook Study Group sessions provide opportunity for kindergarten through fifth grade teachers to meet for one and one-half hours every other week to dialogue about issues relating to implementation of science notebooks. Participants share relevant research articles, student science notebooks, strategies for implementation, and continuing questions regarding the use of science notebooks as a tool for student learning of science content and communicating scientific understanding.
OFFERING: Inquiry into Liquids, 12 hours
OFFERING: Inquiry into Matter, 12 hours
Inquiry into Liquids and Inquiry into Matter are each two-day workshops focusing on teacher development of conceptual understanding of physical science content. Teachers investigate materials and use science notebooks to collect, organize, and analyze data. Dr. Rebecca Dyasi, New York State University, and a TOSA or Teacher Leader, guide participants to enhance and extend scientific content knowledge about matter.
What Are The Project Strategies For
Deepening Teacher Understanding Of Effective Pedagogy
And Assessment That Promotes Student Learning?
How Children Learn and Insightful Use of Investigation in Number, Data, and Space was not offered during year five. All other courses listed above continued to be offered to deepen teachers understanding of effective pedagogy and assessment that promotes student learning. One new workshops was offered during year five to increase teacher understanding of effective pedagogy and assessment using science, mathematics, and technology:
Offering: Integrating Science, Mathematics and Technology 6 30 hours
Integrating Science, Mathematics and Technology was developed collaboratively by MASE mathematics and science TOSAs and district Technology TOSAs. Teachers in grades kindergarten through fifth grades participated in science and mathematics inquiry experiences using digital cameras and KidPix technology to reflect on and communicate their understandings. A focus of this session is using photojournalism to enhance articulation of scientific and mathematical ideas.
How Do You Help Teachers Become Conversant
With The Instructional Materials Designated
For Classroom Use?
Structured Use Workshops for FOSS and Investigations continued to be offered to new teachers during year five with Teacher Leaders assuming greater leadership responsibilities.
What Are The Project Strategies For Supporting
Teachers As They Implement The Materials In Their Classrooms?
Supporting Teachers
During year five, the offerings listed above continued and the K-2 Teacher Leaders and TOSAs worked to provide classroom support for teachers. It was necessary due to the large numbers to have a one-to-many model for site-based sessions. Teachers spend time in groups in Insightful Use sessions in science and K-2 mathematics and find this support valuable. Building "walk-throughs" are scheduled for fall of 2000 to assess teacher/site levels of implementation and needs.
What Strategies Do You Use To Develop Leaders?
Locally MASE project consultants continue to provide invaluable leadership development for MASE leaders. Specialized professional development at the Exploratorium, DMI national institutes, and other opportunities extend leaders capacity to shape MASE offerings and expand the pool of knowledgeable leaders. The tiered model continues to increase the number of leaders that learn from each other. One challenge due to year-round schools is gathering leaders for a Summer Institute. As a result, the Science Summer Institute this year was three days and both science and mathematics held one to two day leadership development sessions throughout the school year. TOSAs and leaders also met in small groups to refine session design.
Use of the Horizon Classroom Protocol was increased during site-based sessions to promote self-reflection and the Professional Development Protocol was used in leadership development. Teacher Leaders observed Structured Use Workshops using the protocol to plan strategies to enhance facilitation skills by focusing on elements in the protocol.
Leadership at all levels of the project was scaled up for teachers and administrators. As part of the mentorship component of leadership development, teachers new to leadership were included in planning and implementing professional development sessions earlier than in the past in an effort to accelerate their development. The strategy shows promise for some leaders.
Lenses On Learning, a professional development curriculum for administrators related to understanding and supporting standards-based mathematics, was successfully field tested as a MASE II professional development offering during year five. MASE II administrators had the choice to attend Lenses on Learning or a MASE offering on supervision.
School teams did not meet in large group sessions during year five. TOSAs met with school teams at the school site as needed.
What Is The Extent Of Teacher Involvement In MASE II?
During year five, the database records indicate 1,114 teachers participated in 38,917.5 hours of MASE II professional development.
See PDF file: 99-00 MASE II Participation.
- What Is The Degree Of Classroom And School Implementation?
Project evaluators report, "Both our professional development observations and our teacher interviews provided us with evidence that teachers are in fact using the LSC instructional materials and pedagogical approaches MASE II promotes. Teachers told us that they (and their colleagues) are implementing the designated instructional materials. They were able to discuss the kinds of pedagogical strategies and tools they are using in their classrooms."
When in schools, TOSAs report that student work on display and use of science notebooks are evidence of increased implementation. They also see more expository trade books in use at schools where teachers are involved in MASE sessions of Science as a Context for Literacy. Teachers are observed asking more questions and telling less.
Principals report that teachers in the second year of Mathematics Assessment Resource Services (MARS) are continuing to implement tasks and assessment strategies learned in assessment workshops. School leadership teams from each of eight project schools participated in four two-day workshops and then shared information and strategies with their staff. Plans implemented at three schools provide examples of implementation:
Antonello
- Planned combined professional development day with Guy and Wilhelm to introduce 3rd-5th grade teachers to the MARS processes. Follow-up work included correlating Investigations to tasks in the Balanced Mathematics, Elementary Grades books. This information has been shared with other schools in the MARS project.
- Grade level teams developed rubrics to use with selected Investigations tasks, based on the processes learned in MARS professional development as on-going assessment.
- Grade level teams applied the processes of sorting student work to guide instructional decisions.
Bracken
- Grade level teams developed benchmark assessments for each nine-week instructional period using multiple forms of assessment, including MARS tasks and rubrics. The assessment tasks are aligned to the key concepts in Investigations and the CEF. A portfolio system is being developed to follow the child, providing a snapshot of the work in mathematics.
Goldfarb
- Six half-day sessions were held in grade level groups to learn about the MARS rubrics, apply the rubrics to student work samples, and identify materials for implementation.
All teachers in grades 3-5 at MARS project schools are giving MARS assessments in the fall and spring of year six. They attend scoring sessions to score assessments using rubrics, mark papers, record data, and reflect on implications for instructional planning. Teacher comments indicate why the sessions are valued:
One teacher responded after a session on examining students written responses to a task:
"Taking a deeper look into the students work allowed me to have a better idea about what they know. At first, I was kind of worried they wouldnt get the task. They really explained their answers and were very thorough. It opened my eyes to those students who really didnt get it. Now, I am just trying to figure out what my next step is with those students."
In reflecting on how analysis of student work can help teachers think about the next instructional moves, a teacher responded:
"This type of assessment has reinforced what I believe about mathematics instruction. Components or parts of all of these tasks should be part of a good daily math program. Students should be explaining and solving open-ended problems and looking for different ways to solve problems. I will continue to strive to incorporate these things into my whole math picture."
Schools sent two teachers from each grade level to a scoring session with MARS staff in early June, 2000, to learn to apply the rubric to a new MARS assessment form. This team of teachers learned to score each test (grades 3-5) and were prepared to facilitate or be a table leader during the district-wide scoring session. The scoring sessions in June were very successful, due in part to this group of leaders. Their experience with MARS staff gave them the confidence to work with their own colleagues, answer questions about the rubric, and support each other as they scored their students work.
Two new Teacher Leaders were identified from this group to join the MARS Leadership team. They attended a Balanced Assessment Workshop in Michigan in June and will be working with the next round of MARS schools this year.
Although not without challenges, the sessions were successful in providing teachers with information about student understanding on the assessment tasks. When asked, "What have you learned about your students understanding on these tasks?", teachers responded:
"Analyzing these tests has helped me to understand how my students think and what strategies they use to solve problems." 3rd grade teacher
"I thought it was interesting that my students did better this year than last year. Yet, I felt my last year students were smarter at this time." 3rd grade teacher
"The students dont have a good grasp of the other types of graphs available and how to properly fill them out. Explanations are still a weak point with them. As they are just working in math journals, this should improve." 5th grade teacher
"I have learned that even my highest achieving math students have difficulty explaining their thinking and applying math concepts to problem solving questions." 5th grade
"Ive learned specific skills students are still unclear about, such as odd and even, reading a chart, etc. Ive learned individuals strengths e.g. some can reason very well and already have concepts of division. Ive learned that some students can apply concepts and knowledge very well and others have great difficulty with it. I know who can communicate mathematically and who cant." - 3rd grade teacher
"I was surprised to see my lower students score high and vice versa with my high students. Ive learned that just because they understand an algorithm they dont necessarily know how to explain a mathematical process." 4th grade teacher
What Professional Development Activities Are Available For Non-Teachers?
The sessions offered to non-teachers continue to be designed to build advocacy for standards-based inquiry teaching and MASE II goals and to generate MASE partnerships with content experts who will team teach with TOSAs and Teacher Leaders to enhance the rigor of the scientific content of MASE professional development offerings.
Although the proposed UNLV course to expand the Elementary Science Education Partnership with UNLV school of medicine was denied, other ways of continuing the partnership are being pursued. The museum group expanded membership and collaborated with MASE to establish CHOLLA (Connecting Hands: Offering Lifelong Learning Adventures). CHOLLA meets bi-monthly to learn about standards-based education, aligning informal education programs (field and classroom) with state standards and district objectives.
MASE will offer a new content course during year six. A scientist was trained with a Teacher Leader to implement the Entomology workshop. This NFS funded professional development curriculum was developed by TEAM 2000, Buffalo Public Schools and First Hand Learning, Inc.
What Are Your Reflections On The Year Five?
Year five stands out as a year of collaboration. MASE TOSAs worked with Language Arts TOSAs and K-5 Instructional Technology TOSAs to design professional development sessions. The partnership with the District Library Administrator grew. The partnership with informal educators moved from a group of individual partners to an organized group, CHOLLA, and partnerships with science experts slowly increased. A new collaboration emerged with the new science education professor at UNLV this year. Each collaboration enhanced project work and continued to weave MASE work into the fabric of the district and the community.
Leadership development continued to demand attention. Existing leaders needed continual support and the demand for new leaders to meet the growing demand for professional development increased. Enlarging the MARS and DMI leadership cadres by sending leaders to national institutes continued to close the gap between the expertise of TOSAs and Teacher Leaders. The number of Teacher Leaders with growing expertise continues to broaden the top of the pyramid.
The Lenses on Learning field-test was successful and again pointed to the need to inform principals for their critical role in supporting reform. The growing importance of nationally designed professional development curriculum to scale up project offerings was reinforced during year five. Carefully selected curriculums such Lenses on Learning, DMI, Bridges to the Mathematics Classrooms, Inquiry into Liquids and Matter and Force and Motion moved teachers and administrators to a deeper level of understanding and involvement with reform.
Year five was the year that demand increased for science and mathematics content courses. As the project matured, so did participation in Force and Motion, Inquiry into Liquids and Matter, and DMI. At the same time, mobility accelerated in MASE project schools as more administrators are new to project schools at the same time as there are more new teachers in the project schools for the coming year as a result of spring 2000 transfer season.
An increased number of schools outside the MASE project requested and participated in professional development funded through the Eisenhower project that mirrored MASE Structured Use sessions for FOSS and Investigations in Number, Data, and Space. This is a sign of the changing culture within the district and recognition of improved student achievement in project schools for typically underachieving students.
4. OUTREACH ACTIVITIES
What Outreach Activities Has Your Project Undertaken?
Math and Science Nights for Families
Twenty-three MASE schools offered Math and Science Nights for Families based on the MASE model and adapted it to community needs during year five of the project.
The MASE partnerships with CHOLLA and other informal education efforts in the community are proving to be extremely beneficial. Through this community platform, the district is becoming surrounded by inquiry science modeled in informal science settings. Informal educators value MASE as a resource as indicated by the following quote:
" Its been great to interact with others who have common goals in an effort
to deliver better programming to students. The opportunity to participate in professional development sessions has been valuable." CHOLLA member
Other community members also access and appreciate the expertise MASE staff as reflected in the following quote:
" The involvement of the MASE community outreach coordinator in the Clark County Public Information and Education's subcommittee on school curriculum was central to our effort. Her part on the committee was the key to any success that we might have. She provided her personal expertise in teaching methods and curriculum requirements. She helped us through a plethora of offices and people to coordinate a new course for teachers' professional development. She referred us to people who could help us in the specifics of the area that we wanted to concentrate on. We relied on her totally to bring the right people and ideas together!"
We are finding growing community advocacy developing as a result of the MASE outreach component. Informal educators are weaving inquiry into their work. They are using science notebooks. CHOLLA members are requesting MASE TOSA assistance to train staff members responsible for informal education. The Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) hired a MASE TOSA and Teacher Leader to write K-2 and 3-5 newsletters, Waters Edge. The SNWA distributes 68,000 newsletters to CCSD schools, 26 private schools and 28 home schools, reaching approximately 105,000 K-5 students with English and Spanish publications. The Waters Edge won the 18th Bronze Quill awards competition, the highest in its category from the International Association of Business Communicators. It also won the Judges Choice award, the highest award among all categories and entries. MASE TOSAs and leaders are invited to assist SNWA when they write curriculum and offer professional development for second and third grade teachers each fall on H2O, The Source, Water Resource Kits.
|