posted by:
|
Kalyani Raghavan
on March 29, 1998
at 1:41PM
|
subject:
|
Is it political science or practical science?
|
In response to John's comment about the kind of comparisons (based on high and low involvement) as political science - first, the extra classrooms observed were selected randomly for the most part except that we wanted at least one observation from each of sixteen districts involved in the program. Ten of those were Horizon selected classrooms. The idea of systemic change is to promote good science teaching across the board through our pd efforts - including those teachers that are self-motivated, those in good districts, and the others. The point I wished to bring out through the message is that there is some level of change at the classroom level - not to the extent we would like - but positive signs of change nevertheless.
This year, we are following up on a subset of these teachers' classrooms to monitor change (if any) due to additional particiaption with ASSET pd activities. I agree with John that unless there is a kind of mentoring or coaching model that is able to provide guidance over a period, the re is little chance that using good materials alone can produce the kind of results we all hope and strive for. This requires an openness to constructive criticism on the part of teachers.
About Brian's question - is there any connection between effective teaching and student outcomes - it is my belief that there is. But it requires teachers to raise their expectations of students, believe that students are capable of more than they think. Just some ideas that came to my mind.
|
|